Explore the differences between single-sided and dual-sided liquidity in DeFi, covering risks, returns, capital efficiency, and how to choose the right model for your portfolio.
When dealing with Concentrated Liquidity, a method that lets liquidity providers focus their capital inside chosen price ranges instead of spreading it thin across the whole curve. Also known as CL, it boosts capital efficiency and can lower slippage for traders. The same concept shows up in Automated Market Maker (AMM), software that automatically processes trades using liquidity pools, in Bin‑Based Liquidity, a structure that splits a pool into discrete price bins for finer control, and in the Dynamic Fee Model, a fee system that adjusts rates based on pool utilization and volatility. Together, these ideas reshape how trades happen on both decentralized and centralized platforms.
At its core, concentrated liquidity lets a provider set a lower and upper price bound. Inside that band, their assets are fully active, earning fees whenever the market trades within the range. Outside the band, the assets sit idle, essentially “off‑grid” until the price moves back. This attribute—price‑range specificity—means less capital is needed to achieve the same depth as a traditional uniform pool. For traders, the result is tighter spreads and less price impact, especially in volatile markets where every basis point counts.
Because the capital stays in a tighter range, the concentrated liquidity model interacts tightly with the AMM formula. The classic constant product formula (x·y = k) still drives price, but the effective k only applies within the selected band. When the price hits the edge, liquidity either migrates to the next bin (in a bin‑based system) or becomes inactive until the pool rebalances. This creates a natural incentive for providers to monitor price movements and adjust their ranges, turning liquidity provision into a semi‑active strategy rather than a set‑and‑forget task.
Bin‑based liquidity takes the idea one step further by dividing the overall price curve into discrete slots, each with its own amount of capital. This granularity lets providers allocate more funds to high‑traffic bins while keeping a lean presence in low‑traffic zones. Coupled with a dynamic fee model, the platform can charge higher fees on bins that are heavily used and lower fees where activity is sparse. The result is a self‑optimizing market where fees reflect real‑time demand, and providers earn proportionally to the risk they take.
In practice, you’ll see these mechanics on platforms like Uniswap v3, where concentrated liquidity is the headline feature, and on newer Solana DEXs such as Meteora DAMM v2 that blend bin‑based liquidity with dynamic fees. Understanding how these pieces fit together helps you decide whether to supply liquidity, trade more efficiently, or evaluate a new DEX’s design. Below you’ll find a curated list of guides, reviews, and deep‑dives that walk through immutability, airdrops, exchange security, and more—each touching on aspects of concentrated liquidity or its surrounding ecosystem.
Explore the differences between single-sided and dual-sided liquidity in DeFi, covering risks, returns, capital efficiency, and how to choose the right model for your portfolio.